Week 2 DraftKings Monday Night Football Showdown: Minnesota Vikings vs. Philadelphia Eagles

Best CPT Values: Philadelphia Eagles RB Miles Sanders —followed by WR DeVonta Smith — has the most positive leverage on the field as a CPT selection.
FLEX Options: Minnesota Vikings WR Justin Jefferson, Eagles WR A.J. Brown and Vikings RB Dalvin Cook project as better FLEX than CPT choices.
Click here to become an expert on the Showdown format and winning strategies.

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

We'll analyze all of the NFL’s “island” games (TNF, SNF and MNF) and playoff matchups this season for DFS purposes, utilizing PFF’s weekly projections, current betting lines and millions of simulated historical combinations to identify the best and worst values for an upcoming matchup.

There are five main components to this Showdown slate analysis that you’ll find below:

A breakdown of methodology and the most similar historical matchup to this game: 2022 Week 11: Philadelphia Eagles–Detroit Lions, with Jalen Hurts as himself and Jared Goff playing the Kirk Cousins role.
Optimal lineup allocations (CPT and total roster) for both teams based on the results of similar historical matchups.
Comparison of player ownership projections for FLEX and CPT produced by a model trained on 2018-2022 Showdown contest results to optimal allocations.
Recent CPT ownership trends are illustrated for both starting lineups.
A table showing the most common players on optimal lineups for each player. This allows you to see which other players are commonly found on the same optimal lineups as a player you’re interested in rostering.

**Click here to sign up and try PFF+ for free!**

METHODOLOGY

To analyze this specific Showdown slate, I looked through thousands of NFL matchups from 2014-to-2022 and found the closest analogies to this contest according to the following parameters: Betting spread, over/under and average fantasy points scoring for the top-ranked positional players of both rosters (QB1, RB1, WR1, TE1).

I won’t detail every matchup that falls into the top 100 for this game, but for illustration purposes, let’s look at the most similar matchup:

Historical			Current
Player	Pos	Team	Player	Pos	Team
Jalen Hurts	QB	PHI	Jalen Hurts	QB	PHI
Boston Scott	RB	PHI	Miles Sanders	RB	PHI
A.J. Brown	WR	PHI	A.J. Brown	WR	PHI
Dallas Goedert	TE	PHI	Dallas Goedert	TE	PHI
Jared Goff	QB	DET	Kirk Cousins	QB	MIN
D'Andre Swift	RB	DET	Dalvin Cook	RB	MIN
Amon-Ra St. Brown	WR	DET	Justin Jefferson	WR	MIN
T.J. Hockenson	TE	DET	Irv Smith Jr.	TE	MIN

The spread and over/under are similar in these matchups (Eagles -5.5, 48.5 O/U versus this matchup at Eagles -2.5, 50.5 O/U). All the players aren’t perfect matches, but that’s why we use 100 similar matchups and not just the single most similar.

The optimal roster for that historical matchup, assuming positional salaries equaled what they are for this showdown slate, would have been:

Player	Team	Position	Roster Position	Fantasy Pts
Miles Sanders	PHI	RB	CPT	18.5
D'Andre Swift	DET	RB	FLEX	29.5
A.J. Brown	PHI	WR	FLEX	28.5
Jalen Hurts	PHI	QB	FLEX	24.7
Jamaal Williams	DET	RB	FLEX	16.0
Kenneth Gainwell	PHI	RB	FLEX	11.2

For this game and 99 other similar matchups, I calculated every possible combination that fits with Showdown rules (one CPT, at least one offensive player from each team) and would fall under the $50K salary threshold, assuming the salaries for the historical similar matchups are the same as those for this contest.

CHOOSING THE RIGHT CAPTAIN

The most unique part of the format, and therefore the biggest opportunity for a competitive advantage, is choosing your CPT. Should you always choose a QB who typically has the highest absolute fantasy scoring? Are defenses and kickers viable options? RB versus WR?

I went through the millions of possible lineup combinations for the 100 most similar matchups and found who the CPT selections were on the top-five scoring lineups for each matchup. Here are the 500 CPT choices from those matchups by position rank according to salary.

BREAKING DOWN TOTAL OPTIMAL ROSTERS

This graph illustrates the full range of allocations for the different positions to measure how many of the 500 optimal rosters had exactly zero, one or two of the given positions.

HISTORICAL OWNERSHIP

The boxplot above shows the ranges for CPT ownership for each starting player in contests since 2019.

PROJECTED OWNERSHIP VERSUS NORMAL

This is where the analysis comes together and becomes actionable. What’s most important when viewing these numbers is to contrast them to the optimal numbers taken from the analysis above for different positions. Then, we see where the leverage may exist.

The two tables below compare the optimal allocations above, with adjustments for the personnel of this particular matchup, to our ownership projections for CPT and FLEX.